+ All Categories
Home > Food > Peter Jens

Peter Jens

Date post: 21-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: eriaff2014
View: 1,253 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Integrated Crop Management Biologicals Today & Future Trends & Challenges Peter Jens Global Alliance Manager (Agtivist and Registered Lobbyist)
Transcript
Page 1: Peter Jens

Integrated Crop Management

Biologicals

Today & Future

Trends & Challenges

Peter Jens

Global Alliance Manager

(Agtivist and Registered Lobbyist)

Page 2: Peter Jens

-Develop novel organic

techniques, out-of-soil,

for protected crops.

-Change or influence

EU organic regulations

Page 3: Peter Jens

Sustainable Crop Production Intensification

“..produce more with the same area of land while conserving resources, reducing negative impacts on the environment and enhancing natural capital and the flow of the ecosystem services

United Nations Book from the Food and Agriculture Organisation A policy makers’ guide to the sustainable intensification of small holder crop production

Page 4: Peter Jens

Soil health

Agriculture must, literally, return to its roots by rediscovering the importance of healthy soil, drawing on natural resources of plant nutrition, and using mineral fertilizer wisely.

Crops and Varieties Farmers will need a genetically diverse portfolio of improved crop varieties that are suited to a range of agro-ecosystems and farming practices, and resilient to climate change

Page 5: Peter Jens

Plant protection

Pesticides kill pests, but also pest’s natural enemies and their overuse can harm farmers, consumers and the environment. The first line of defence is a healthy agro-ecosystem

Water management Sustainable intensification requieres smart, precision technologies for irrigation and farming practices that use ecosystem approaches to conserve water

Page 6: Peter Jens

Promising directions in Integrated Pest & Disease

Management that require further research

Page 7: Peter Jens

“Good forecasts are not those that occur, but those that lead to action.”

Michel Godet, 2012

1962 1972 1987

Page 8: Peter Jens

New Roads to New Goals

The Market demands residu-poor or even residu-free produce (food safety)

- Retailers impose extra-legal requirements on farmers

More attention for worker safety of the farmer and his personel

Society and Legislator want less impact on the environment and public health

- Stronger regulatory requirements have lead to less and safer pesticides

- IPM has to lead to reduced use of pesticides (National Action Plans)

- No emission of pesticides into the environment (Water Framework)

Sustainable Food Production : more production with less input and less impact.

Page 9: Peter Jens

Challenges for sustainable crop protection

Residue Management

- license to supply

Resistance Management

- relying only on pesticides will lead to pesticide resistance problems

- pesticide resistance leads to more intensive usage

Rentability

- more yield with less cost and less Risk

Page 10: Peter Jens

Focus for the future?

Chemical pesticides will no longer be the only basis for crop protection.

Integrated Pest and Disease Management is raised to a higher level.

Resilience against climate change and invasive alien pests and diseases

Page 11: Peter Jens
Page 12: Peter Jens

From mainly curing, to mainly preventing

From reductionism to holism

Resilient production systems

- from risky balancing …

- … to self-balancing systems

Systems thinking at all system levels (prevention)

Resilient Plant

Resilient Soil/Substrate

Resilient Cropping Systems

Resilient Agro-ecosystems

Resilient Society

“the root cause”

efficiency

sufficiency

Page 13: Peter Jens

Society

Agroecosystem

Cropping System

Plant

Pest/Disease Control Agents

before planting

during cropping

after harvest

IPM = Systems Thinking

+ interactions between system levels and feedback for continuous improvement.

Page 14: Peter Jens

Biological Control Agents

Develop and improve beneficial insects and mites

- Screening of new BCA’s

- Selective breeding

- Generalists

- “Standing army” of predators

Sterile Insect Technique

Develop and improve microbial

antagonists of pests and diseases

Pseudomonas chlororaphis

op Fusarium oxysporum

on tomato roots

Page 15: Peter Jens
Page 16: Peter Jens

Resilient Plants Breeding for Resistance

- (partial) resistance, multi gene resistance

- more adapted for beneficial insects and mites

Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR)

Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR)

- activators

- micro-organisms : seed treatment

- predatory bugs

Endophytes : “systemic” micro-organisms

Resistance Inducing Substrates

Low doses of pesticides to slow down pest development

Preventive release of predators and parasites (“standing army”)

Page 17: Peter Jens
Page 18: Peter Jens

Resilient Soils/Substrates

a.k.a. “suppressive soils”

1. Respecting (microbial) soil life

- avoid harmful pesticides

- improve the physical/abiotic conditions in the soil

2. Increasing the quantity of (microbial) soil life

- soil organic material (SOM), compost, green manure, …

- biostimulants

3. Increasing the diversity of (microbial) soil life

- soil organic material (SOM), compost, green manure, …

4. Adding specific antagonists

- Trichoderma spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., etc.

Page 19: Peter Jens

The root cause …

Pineda et al., 2010, Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends in Plant Science. Vol.15,Issue 9, p. 507-514

Page 20: Peter Jens

What can microbes do for us ?

• Tolerance to salinity

osmotic protectants : enable crop production in salinated soils

• Tolerance to drought stress

enable crops to better tolerate periods of drought.

Soil Food Web !

Page 21: Peter Jens

Crop Protection & Productivity

Increased production when intensive use of chemical pesticides is stopped.

Plant growth promoting (PGP) effect of antagonistic micro-organisms (“biofertilizers”).

Reduction of use of chemical fertilizers by applying micro-organisms (“biofertilizers”).

Protection against salt stress and drought stress by using micro-organisms.

Convergence of Integrated Pest & Disease Management (IPM) and Integrated Soil & Nutrient Management (INM).

Page 22: Peter Jens

Plant Protection Policy Paradox

Succesful European policy aimed at reducing the number of chemical PPP’s and the use of chemical PPP’s.

BUT: Policy is not sufficiently aimed at enabling the development and availability of alternatives:

1.Registration requirements for microbials.

2.Very long registration proces for microbial biological control agents due to insufficient expertise of the examiners.

3.Declining support of research into non-chemical alternatives. Tunnelvision with regards to genetics only.

4.Regulation of biostimulants and biofertilisers, now considered as PPP’s under 1107/2009.

Page 23: Peter Jens

“We are now on the threshold of a third

phase in the development of IPM systems

that recognizes pests not as enemies,

but as indicators of problems in the design

and management of systems”

Hill (1985)

Page 24: Peter Jens

Credos

Food certainty

Food safety

Sustainability

“the root cause”

Page 25: Peter Jens

What is biological crop protection for Koppert? Natural plant vitality

Page 26: Peter Jens

Advantages of biological crop protection

Safer than chemical products for the grower, employee and consumer

Pests cannot become resistant to natural enemies

Better for the environment

Natural enemies actively search for the prey

Eliminates pesticide residues

Improves marketability

Page 27: Peter Jens

Integrated crop protection

Balanced application of natural enemies and chemical pesticides.

“Biological control where possible, chemicals when necessary.”

Page 29: Peter Jens

Predators

Page 30: Peter Jens

Predators

Page 31: Peter Jens

Parasites

Page 32: Peter Jens

Insect Pathogens

Page 33: Peter Jens

Insect Pathogenic Nematodes

Page 34: Peter Jens

Pheromones


Recommended