LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
VDI-Fachtagung laquoInnovative Antrieberaquo ∙ Dresden ∙ 23 November 2016
Erneuerbare Energien im Verkehr 2050 Ergebnisse und Gedankenfutter aus fuumlnf explorativen 100-Szenarien fuumlr die Forschungsvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinen eV (FVV)
Patrick R Schmidt ∙ Werner Weindorf ∙ Werner Zittel
LBST ∙ Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH ∙ Munich ∙ Germany
2016-11-23 ∙ WEB
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST ∙ Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
2
Independent expert for sustainable energy and mobility for over 30 years
Bridging technology markets and policy
Renewable energies fuels infrastructure
Technology-based strategy consulting System and technology studies Sustainability assessment
Global and long term perspective
Rigorous system approach ndash thinking outside the box
Serving international clients in industry finance politics and NGOs
Reference projects
FVV Renewables in Transport 2050
UBA Power-to-Liquids for Aviation
BMVI German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy (MKS)
JRCEUCARCONCAWE (JEC) Well-to-Tank Analyses httpwwwlbstderessourcesdocs2016FVV_H1086_Renewables-in-Transport-2050-Kraftstoffstudie_IIpdf
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
3
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
FVV study motivation
Greenhouse gas reduction targets of 80-951990 by 2050 will require substantial contributions from the transport sector
Renewable electricity to become the primary energy source in future
100 renewable electricity in transport by 2050 ndash pie in the sky
2 archetype scenarios + 1 synthetic mix scenario
What are the consequences in terms of energy and costs
What are determinants for future use of internal combustion engines
4
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
German laquoKlimaschutzplan 2050raquo on the occasion of COP22 in Marrakesh
5
Quelle Klimaschutzplan 2050 der Bundesregierung 11112016 S 2627
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST ∙ Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
2
Independent expert for sustainable energy and mobility for over 30 years
Bridging technology markets and policy
Renewable energies fuels infrastructure
Technology-based strategy consulting System and technology studies Sustainability assessment
Global and long term perspective
Rigorous system approach ndash thinking outside the box
Serving international clients in industry finance politics and NGOs
Reference projects
FVV Renewables in Transport 2050
UBA Power-to-Liquids for Aviation
BMVI German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy (MKS)
JRCEUCARCONCAWE (JEC) Well-to-Tank Analyses httpwwwlbstderessourcesdocs2016FVV_H1086_Renewables-in-Transport-2050-Kraftstoffstudie_IIpdf
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
3
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
FVV study motivation
Greenhouse gas reduction targets of 80-951990 by 2050 will require substantial contributions from the transport sector
Renewable electricity to become the primary energy source in future
100 renewable electricity in transport by 2050 ndash pie in the sky
2 archetype scenarios + 1 synthetic mix scenario
What are the consequences in terms of energy and costs
What are determinants for future use of internal combustion engines
4
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
German laquoKlimaschutzplan 2050raquo on the occasion of COP22 in Marrakesh
5
Quelle Klimaschutzplan 2050 der Bundesregierung 11112016 S 2627
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
3
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
FVV study motivation
Greenhouse gas reduction targets of 80-951990 by 2050 will require substantial contributions from the transport sector
Renewable electricity to become the primary energy source in future
100 renewable electricity in transport by 2050 ndash pie in the sky
2 archetype scenarios + 1 synthetic mix scenario
What are the consequences in terms of energy and costs
What are determinants for future use of internal combustion engines
4
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
German laquoKlimaschutzplan 2050raquo on the occasion of COP22 in Marrakesh
5
Quelle Klimaschutzplan 2050 der Bundesregierung 11112016 S 2627
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
FVV study motivation
Greenhouse gas reduction targets of 80-951990 by 2050 will require substantial contributions from the transport sector
Renewable electricity to become the primary energy source in future
100 renewable electricity in transport by 2050 ndash pie in the sky
2 archetype scenarios + 1 synthetic mix scenario
What are the consequences in terms of energy and costs
What are determinants for future use of internal combustion engines
4
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
German laquoKlimaschutzplan 2050raquo on the occasion of COP22 in Marrakesh
5
Quelle Klimaschutzplan 2050 der Bundesregierung 11112016 S 2627
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
German laquoKlimaschutzplan 2050raquo on the occasion of COP22 in Marrakesh
5
Quelle Klimaschutzplan 2050 der Bundesregierung 11112016 S 2627
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
6
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion Pkm Aviation FootBike Public transportMot individual transport Renewbility IIVP 2030MKS 2050 ShelleMobil 2050 Grenzenlos Energiekonzept ZieleMobil 2050 Regional Verbaumlndekonzept
LBST
201
5-07
-09
Two distinct transportation demand scenarios | DE | HIGH LOW
Scenario developments 2010ndash2050 (figures rounded)
HIGH transport demand scenario [BMVI VP 2030MKS 2050]
ndash Passenger +30
ndash Freight +60
LOW transport demand scenario [eMobil 2050 bdquoRegionalldquo]
ndash Passenger -25
ndash Freight +20
7 0
200
400
600
800
1000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
billion tkm Aviation Ship (waterway)Train Road (other)Road (trailer truck) VP 2030LBST 2050Energiekonzept Ziel eMobil 2050 GrenzenlosVerbaumlndekonzept eMobil 2050 Regional
LBST
201
5-07
-09
BMVI ∙ German Federal Transport Ministry MKS ∙ German Mobility amp Fuels Strategy
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Target scenario ndash gradual shift from today to 100 renewable PtX by 2050
Gasolinekerosenediesel
Methanol
Methane
Hydrogen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Shar
e r
en
wab
leGasolinekerosenedieselfrom crude oil
via PtL from renewableelectricity
Renewable share in the fuels (per MJ fuel)
8 PtL ∙ Power-to-Liquids PtX ∙ Power-to-Anything
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Definition of three distinct fuelpowertrain scenarios
PTL | Conservative scenario based on well established fuelspowertrainsinfrastructures incl ICE mild hybrids with power-to-liquids dominating all transportation modes high fuel demand
FVV | A mix of currently discussed options comprising ambitious ICE development progress incl ICE hybrids REEV BEV FCEV medium fuel demand
eMob | Derived from the study ldquoeMobil 2050rdquo [Oumlko-Institut 2015] with a dominance of electrified drivetrains low fuel demand
9
BEV ∙ Battery-electric vehicle eMob ∙ Electric mobility FCEV ∙ Fuel cell-electric vehicle FVV ∙ Research association PHEV ∙ Plug-in hybrid vehicle PTL ∙ Power-to-liquids REEV ∙ Range-extender vehicle
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuelpowertrain scenario | New car registrations
10
PTL CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 80 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 2030 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 2040 10 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 2050 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
FVV CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 36 5 45 2 6 0 4 1
2030 0 0 55 5 25 0 10 5
2040 0 0 37 2 45 0 16 9
2050 0 0 0 0 70 0 20 10
eMob CAR
[new-reg]
ICE Gasol Diesel
ICE Methane
Hybrid Gasol Diesel
Hybrid Methane
REEV Gasol Diesel
REEV Methane
BEV FCEV
2010 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 86 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 2030 68 5 6 0 9 0 12 0 2040 0 0 10 0 17 0 72 0 2050 0 0 5 0 12 0 82 0
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
11
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Greenhouse gas emissions (example FVV scenario)
12
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Non-CO2-GHG vehicle
Methanol
H2
Electricity mix (train)
Electricity mix (04 kV)
CH4
DieselKerosene
Gasoline
Past Future
Greenhouse gas emissions | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
13
by fuel
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
GH
G e
mis
sio
ns
(Mt
CO
2e
qy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future by mode
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
Climate impacts from high-altitude emissions (aviation) not included
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Final fuel demand electricity demand
14
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Fuel demand (TWha) | DE | All transport | laquoFVVraquo
Growth in HIGH transport demand overcompensates efficiency improvements
Relative importance of trucks and aviation in fuel demand increases
Thereof notably international aviation 15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
FVV + HIGH FVV + LOW
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
20
50
Fin
al e
ne
rgy
use
(TW
hy
r)
Aviation
Ships (freight)
Trucks
Rail (freight)
Rail (passenger)
Buses
Passenger vehicles
Past Future
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Total electricity demand in 2050 may be a factor 2 to 4 of todayrsquos electricity demand
All scenarios would likely require renewable energy imports
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
TWha
PTL + HIGH
PTL + LOW
FVV + HIGH
FVV + LOW
eMob + LOW
LBST
201
5-1
1-27
non-transport PtX (heat chemicals)
non-transport efficiency targets
521 TWhe net electricity consumption 2014
Electricity demand (TWhea) | DE | Today + transportation
16
1000 TWhea technical renewable electricity potential (this study)
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
hellip and cumulated investments until 2050
17
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Methodology
The cumulated investments consist of the following elements
ndash Renewable power plants
ndash PtX production plants
ndash Infrastructure for fuel transport amp distribution
Investments for end-of-life replacements are included in the cost model with a PtX plant lifetime of 25 years
Learning curves for electrolysers assumed ie the 1st PtX production plant is more expensive than the nth one
BEV home-charging assumed
Vehicle costs not included
18
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Cumulated investments until 2050 | Germany
19 For comparison 2014 in Germany
Gross domestic product (GDP) = 2900 billion euroa
gt70 GW renewable power (38 GW wind onshore 3 GW wind offshore 39 GW PV)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PTL+HIGH PTL+LOW FVV+HIGH FVV+LOW eMob+LOW
billion euro
6200 H2 refuelling stations
4600 CH4 refueling stations
PtX production plants
360-900 GW RES power plants
PTL FVV eMob
LBST
201
5-12
-23
BEV Home charging
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
System integration of fluctating renewable power generation
20
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Efficiency vs renewables integration (Scaling indicativefor educational purpose)
Trade-off between efficiency and renewable power integration (ldquoSystemdienlichkeitrdquo)
Robust option Hydrogen
Sole option providing zero well-to-wheel emissions AND long-term energy storage Hydrogen
BEV battery-electric vehicle EV electric vehicle DSM demand-side management PTG power-to-gas PTL power-to-liquids
Electric powertrain Zero (local) emissions
demand flexible up to few hours
demand flexibility over hoursday(s) Energy storage over daysweeksmonths
demand flexibility add measures
LBST
201
5-12
-18
EV Overhead
line
BEV Charging
PTG Hydrogen
PTG Methane
PTL Gasoline Diesel
Efficiency Propulsion+Upstream
Storage density amp Demand flexibility
21
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Agenda
1 Motivation and approach
2 Scenarios
3 Results
Greenhouse gas emissions
Energy demand
Cumulated investments
4 Conclusions
22
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Conclusions from the FVV Future Fuel study in a nutshell
Transportation demand development (pkm tkm) is strongest driver for fuelelectricity demand
PtX fuel costs could half between 2015 and 2050 PtL imports ~20 lower in cost Further cost reductions are subject to location-specific business cases
PtX costs are dominated by electricity costs which strongly depends on the fuel choice (H2 CH4 PTL) and associated plant efficiencies
Fuel distribution infrastructure costs are negligible compared to the upstream investments required for any of the scenarios analysed
Cumulated investments for Energiewende (energy transition) in the transportation sector seem manageable for any of the scenarios analysed
All scenarios analysed will probably exceed technicalacceptable renewable electricity potentials in Germany Import of PtL (if any) is likely for cost reasons
Transport must get more electric with regard to the fuel and the propulsion system
23 pkm ∙ person kilometre tkm ∙ tonne kilometre PtX ∙ Power-to-anything PtL ∙ Power-to-liquids
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Literature
P Schmidt W Zittel W Weindorf T Raksha (LBST)
Renewables in Transport 2050 ndash Empowering a sustainable mobility future with zero emission fuels from renewable electricity ndash Europe and Germany
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV (ed)
FVV-Report 1086 2016
Download
httpwwwfvv-netdeendownloadrenewables-in-transport-2050renewables-in-transport-2050html
24
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
LBST Experts
Patrick Schmidt (Dipl-Ing)
T +49 (0)89 608110-36 E PatrickSchmidtLBSTde
Dr Werner Zittel
Werner Weindorf (Dipl-Ing)
Tetyana Raksha (Dipl-Ing)
LBST Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
Daimlerstr 15 85521 MunichOttobrunn Germany httpwwwlbstde
25
Acknowledgement
This study was financed by the FVV and supported by members of the FVV Working Group laquoFuture Fuelsraquo
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
ANNEX
26
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Technical renewable power generation potentials
27
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany and EU-28
Germany and the EU have (very) high technical renewable electricity potentials
ndash DE ~1000 TWha potential vs ~500 TWh net electricity consumption
ndash EU ~11000 TWha potential vs ~2800 TWh net electricity consumption
Only ~11 (DE) and ~6 (EU28) if this potentials are currently used for renewable power production
The limits to renewable power growth seem to be more of an acceptance issue than costs
[ISE 2015] states PV electricity production costs of 2-4 euroctkWh in Southern and Central Europe by 2050
Renewable power potentials assessed for solarthermal power plants could also be exploited with photovoltaics
28
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
Renewable electricity potentials in Germany (bars can be stacked)
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Windonshore Windoffshore PV Hydro Geothermal
Tech
nic
al p
ote
nti
al (
TWh
yr)
Net electricity consumption 2014 521 TWhyr
Lud
wig
-Bouml
lko
w-S
yste
mte
chn
ik G
mb
H (
LBST
) 2
01
5-1
0-0
5
Maximum
Minimum
Bandwidth for technical renewableenergy potentials
Assumption in this study
1000 TWhyr
Potential already exploited
Data [BMU 2010] [BMU 2012] [BWE 2013] [ISE 2015] [IWES_PV 2012] [IWES 2012] [Quaschning 2013] [TAB 2003] [UBA 2013] 2014 data [AGEB 2015] provisional as per 082015 2014 data [BDEW 2015] provisional as per 082015
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
CO2 avoidance costs
30
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2
LBSTde 23 November 2016 Ludwig-Boumllkow-Systemtechnik GmbH
ludwig boumllkow
systemtechnik
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000G
aso
line
kero
sen
ed
iese
l
EE-P
tL m
eth
ano
l ro
ute
EE-P
tL F
T ro
ute
EE-P
tL S
OEC
met
han
ol r
ou
te
EE-P
tL S
OEC
-FT
rou
te
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
)
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
EE-C
H4
(C
NG
) SO
EC
EE-C
H4
(LN
G)
SOEC
EE-C
GH
2 (
on
site
)
Elec
tric
ity
for
BEV
Liquid fuelsreference
Liquid fuels (PtL) Gaseous fuels (PtG) Electricity
FOSSIL RENEWABLE
GH
G a
void
ance
co
sts
(eurot
CO
2e
qu
ival
en
t)
2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
LBST
20
15
-12
-22
Benchmarks Fuels from
crude oil(0 eurot CO2)
-58-57
-67 -67
-58
-61
-62
-65-67
-23
CO2 avoidance costs well-to-tank [eurot CO2-eq] for PtX in DE
31
Least-cost short-term Electricity
Least-cost long-term Electricity and CGH2